Open Letter
To
FIDE President
Kirsan Iljumshinov
Russian Chess Federation
Elista, 29. September 2006
Requests of Vladimir Kramnik
To proceed with GAME 5
Clause 3.17.1., Schedule 2 of the contract:
“All protests must be submitted in writing to the Appeals Committee not
more than 2 hours after the relevant playing session.”
The protest made by the Topalov Team were not made within
this window after game 4 (27 September 2006) but only hit the FIDE Office and
the Appeals Committee on the rest day (28 September 2006). Therefore the protests
are not even relevant and should have been rejected by the Appeals Committee immediately.
Clause 3.18.3., Schedule 2 of the contract:
“After the World Chess Championship Committee agrees with the Organizers
on the arrangements in respect of the tournament hall, facilities etc. etc. etc…….,
no objections from the participants shall be acceptable as long as the conditions
are in accordance with the rights of the players granted in their agreements.”
This clause clearly underlines the statement made in today’s
Open letter: “By starting the match both participants agreed all the playing
conditions de facto and de jure and the conditions are therefore legally binding.
Any change of the playing conditions without a good reason would in our understanding
request the approval of both players which is not the case here.”
Therefore it is clear that the Appeals Committee took a
completely wrong decision and was obviously not even aware of the Rules and Regulations.
The decision of Chief Arbiter Mr. Gijssen to forfeit game 5 was clearly based
on a wrong decision of the Appeals Committee and shall be nullified.
Mr. Kramnik is ready to continue the match and to play the
5th game (with a leading score of 3:1) on the conditions that were accepted prior
to the start of the match.
Toilet issue
The toilets connected to the restrooms shall be opened again. This request is
in accordance with clauses 3.17.1. and 3.18.3 (see above) and in the general understanding
that by starting of the match both participants agreed to all the playing conditions.
Any change of the playing conditions without a good reason would require the approval
of both players which is not the case here.
Mr. Kramnik is ready to accept even stricter controls by
sealing the toilets before and after inspections. Inspections shall be done before
and after each game.
Exchange of members of the Appeals Committee
We repeat that the Kramnik team does not trust the objectivity of the Appeals
Committee anymore. It is evident from this letter and our first Open Letter today
that the existing Appeals Committee is biased and incompetent. Mr. Kramnik strongly
insists once again that the members of the Appeals Committee will be exchanged
immediately.
Access to Recordings
As Mr. Kramnik in the press conference stated he did not sign a contract for acting
in a reality show. The recordings shall be observed by the arbiters. Neither Team
Topalov nor Team Kramnik shall have access to the recordings. Investigations shall
be in the sole responsibility of the Arbiters.
Requested Apology
Last but not least Mr. Kramnik believes that Mr. Danailov should apologize
to Mr. Kramnik in writing. Remarks such as:
“If the match were to continue, the World Champion
will refrain from shaking hands with Mr. Kramnik before the games and will not
take part in joint press conferences with him.” and “Veselin
Topalov is disturbed by the suspicious behavior of his opponent Mr. Vladimir Kramnik
who takes his most significant decisions in the bathroom.” are clearly
insulting.
On behalf of Vladimir Kramnik
Yours sincerely,
Carsten Hensel
(Manager to Vladimir Kramnik, Classical World Chess Champion)
|